
There is a general feeling among those in the know, that NHS has not been very successful in fulfilling the services it agreed to at the time of the consolidation. And that pertains to me how ??
As a citizen of Washoe County I have certain rights, basic doggie rights, like to be safe in my own yard. To walk on leash next to my owner without fear of aggressive unrestrained dogs attacking me, & to assume that the animals I meet in my daily life are relatively disease and parasite free. I want to know that the policy of Washoe County, which authorizes the enforcement of all NRS and county Code 55 is following due diligence. I have very real concerns about how far we can back up for NHS and maintain a safe environment for me and my human companion . When NHS refuses to do owner surrender Euthanasia that puts the burden on the county, that takes staff time and space, throwing away the Wildlife Rehab program is putting the burden on the County. If NHS took these animals their Euth rates would go way up, because most pigeons and squirrels are not reclaimed by their owners......We have County employees doing this on the taxpayer dollar because it cuts into the profits and kill rates of a private corporation NHS. The feral cat program in fact, conflicts with the law in several areas. Animal abandonment, limits, general care and oversight of domestic animals. Looking into the " colony rooms" how about " floor space" how about following any of the sections of 574 written into the Nevada Revised Statutes. Since February of 2006 there has been a steady decline in the quality of life for animals surrendered on Longley Ln. More is not always better and if the NHS takes the swan dive all of us who know animal sheltering predict...does the county get it's money back ?? Who will pay for the care of surrendered animals when NHS blows through it's endowment ?
Priss is absolutely driven to know....


