
What is "No Kill"
To answer this, it is helpful to decide what the term "no kill" means to you:
Does "no kill" mean that no animal is ever euthanized?
Does "no kill" mean that no adoptable animal is euthanized?
How is adoptable defined?
Is the East Bay SPCA a "No Kill" Shelter?
The East Bay SPCA does not euthanize for space or for time. We do not euthanize what we determine are adoptable animals.
We will euthanize when an animal requires medical treatment that goes beyond our ability to humanely provide, or has a condition that puts other shelter animals or workers at risk.
We will also choose euthanasia when an animal has negative behaviors, such as unmanageable aggression towards other dogs, or aggression towards people that goes beyond our ability to correct, especially if that behavior presents a safety concern to a potential adopter or to the community.
We do not feel it is responsible to place a dangerous animal in the community. We also do not feel it is responsible to imply that we would.
There are few organizations with the money and facilities to keep an animal that is ill or unsafe around people. In fact, keeping such animals while thousands of healthy, adoptable animals are killed because there is no place to keep them could be considered an unconscionable decision.
While "no kill" is a popular phrase in today's animal welfare environment, we do not find its use responsible. We discourage the use of the phrase "no kill." It hides the problem. We instead want to be very clear to our community what our choices are and how our decisions are made.
How does the East Bay SPCA reduce the euthanasia of dogs and cats in the community?
No shelter in one community works in a vacuum. Our efforts are reflected in each other's animal population. The East Bay SPCA is a private facility. When we run out of room, we have the luxury of closing our doors until the animals we have are adopted. We could reduce euthanasia in our shelter to zero if we did not euthanize any animals, regardless of health or behavior. However, we would quickly become full, and unable to accept animals from other shelters, since the animals here would never be placed in homes.
Public shelters, with an obligation to the city or county that funds them, do not have that luxury. When public shelters are full they have no choice but to euthanize even adoptable animals to make space for those incoming. Public shelters rely on us and other private shelters or rescue groups to take in adoptable animals and keep their population low enough to avoid euthanizing.
What about rehabilitating animals?
We work extremely hard with the limited resources we have to extend medical services. Our public veterinary clinic subsidizes the medical care we provide to shelter animals. As a result, many conditions that would doom the life of a dog or cat in another shelter can be treated here.
We perform amputations when needed, remove tumors, set broken limbs, and often can treat contagious conditions like mange or ringworm, all on animals that were otherwise adoptable, in order to save their life and ensure they wind up in a home.
We work diligently to provide training and behavior modification to dogs, including those with problems. Every attempt is made to work with a dog's negative behaviors to reach a manageable stage. Perhaps with limitations, that dog can be safely placed in a home. This is not always possible but the decision to euthanize comes only after considerable effort, and with the support from staff.
Similarly, cats displaying dangerous behaviors or problems such as not using the litter box, are not just turned over to a new owner "as is." We work with these animals in the shelter or in foster homes to determine if the problem can be "fixed." If it can't be fixed, euthanasia is a humane alternative.
"I don't support euthanasia, so how can I support you?"
We don't support euthanasia either, but until a community has a home for every dog and cat, it will inevitably occur--somewhere. Euthanasia is not the fault of any shelter, public or private. The fault belongs to people who do not support spay and neuter or practice responsible pet ownership. As long as there are owners who abuse or neglect animals, who casually discard animals, or who allow unaltered pets to run free, there will be dedicated shelter workers performing humane euthanasia.
By supporting the East Bay SPCA, you are supporting your community. We look at the entire community as our problem--not just the animals in our shelter! If there are homeless, adoptable animals anywhere in our community being euthanized, we have not yet succeeded. We cannot justify keeping unadoptable or potentially dangerous animals kenneled or caged for the rest of their lives while thousands of adoptable ones are euthanized elsewhere in our community. Even if we aren't the ones doing it.
We have chosen the solution that allows us to save the most animals in our community, instead of just the few we can shelter in our own facilities. If you would like to comment on this statement, or have any questions, please send us an email to info@eastbayspca.org
Pictured is Oreo, as she sits on the daybed in the computer room, she seems to be such a part of the office. And very involved in the work....

16 comments:
This has to be the most honest statement on no kill that I have come across.
There is no shame in admitting that some animals are just beyond your capability of helping.
Euthanasia is not taken lightly, even for those us who are against the "no kill" movement as presented these days. For as many as I have had to do, it never gets any easier. I think it gets harder, such a waste of life. But I have enough experience to know that it is a necessary evil that we will endure until people learn humanity toward animals.
I hate the term "no kill". In my opinion, it is deceiving the public, lulling them into thinking it is okay now to surrender their dog that has lived it's life outside on a chain. It is okay to allow the cat to have kittens and keep the children entertained until they start to be a problem. Give them to the shelter, they won't kill them. It began as a marketing term for closed door shelters of the non profits. Now the ignorant and inexperienced think it is actually something that can exist for open door shelters. It is meant to solicit donations but it has turned our shelters into dumping grounds instead.
Oreo does good work, but she is my breed. I will forward this to our county council. We are still on the edge of going private up here. These are things that need to be seen and this blog has been a source of information ; thanks to you and Catmom both. Oh, and the new Honesty Helps is from California?
This should be engraved in gold . We can't, we are trying, but we can't keep up. I read the comment on the newspaper blog, sick kittens. is that a surprise ? Maybe John Doe the public man can get attention, we can't.
Love this! Thanks for sharing.
That is a description of the old NV Humane Society. To bad our community no longer has such an honest organization in its midst.
This would be the outfit that got my donation dollar. How rare to find such integrity in a no kill solutions quagmire. It was on the newspaper blog yesterday Aug 6,2008 posted by lismacb that all the cats were sick, and some had been sick for a long time. There were 477 cats at ten o'clock last night.....
Heading out the door, but stopped for my Oreo fix. Very glad I did. This is an excellent view to take when dealing with living creatures. I would like to shake the hand of the writer. I had told one person about the cocker Monty and she said she turned around and walked back out 20 feet down the hall. she felt bad, but could see from the dampness and odors this poor dog was probably still having skin issues. People cannot afford to bring home a sick dog right now, especially if there are other dogs to be infected. As is will not get these babies in a permanent home.
KCSharon, yes, I am in California but originally from Georgia. And I am pleased that you are finding good information to fight the fight for our animals.
Here's why we must remain diligent. In 1997/98, a bill was introduced at the capitol called the Hayden Act. Tom Hayden, Jane Fonda's ex-husband introduced it (that's enough for me)and it was the worse piece of legislation ever. We said it would never pass and therefore little work was done to stop it. It did pass and it caused more adoptable animals to be killed than anything has ever done. It was written by a law professor, not someone who was familiar with shelters, etc. Sure, it looks good on paper (just like the Whino does) but in reality it was a disaster for the shelters.
That taught me a lesson, never underestimate the enemy. Those who believe in "no kill" supported this bill, those of us who supported the animals didn't. So you must always be on the alert.
The new kid on the block is learning and changing. When we moved up here, I don't think we had ever heard of no kill, we wanted a dog and went to the pound. We got Lucy from a shelter in Sac 8 years ago and she has been our best friend.
When we went to get a puppy for her to play with after moving to Reno we saw a big difference in shelters. I don't think it was just a Reno change, there are more pitbulls everywhere. And I know Oreo loves Pit's but they are not the best to bring in on an existing pet w're told. We did end up with a lab mix puppy with 4 white feet, so we have our concerns. We can deal with that when it comes up. Maybe that is how all the 2 year old pits end up in the pound. People bring them home as puppies and hope for the best. Maybe we will become part of the problem. Jeannie has been good on this blog, my wife and I decided that if trouble comes we will just keep the dogs in separate areas. Lucy is older and won't last forever and we can get through. I appreciate her efforts at keeping her two pits. Could we get the name of the trainer that helped her? My wife volunteers at SPCA off and on and thinks she knows who it may be, but we don't know how to reach her. If you have a number Jeannie, don't post it, but you could ask her if she would be interested in helping us with Riley if a problem does occur. I would be willing to pay, we got Riley in Sac, he is not a local adopt. MY wife and I both agree that no kill and open admisson won't work. and my wife was a no kill convert untill we saw NHS. It is clear there is a problem. If SPCA had puppies available we would have gone there, but we put health first. that article is straight to the point, and Iould bet they have a healty population
the story is well written and sadly true. we got our cat from Pet Network and it is very healthy, did anyone see on the other blog the cats at NHS are all sick ? Glad we drove up grade and not down.
Sheldon, I wouldn't worry too much if it is a puppy. You are able to do things now that will prevent problems in the future. I love pits but I don't trust them. And if you get anything other than a puppy and you don't know what happened to it prior to you getting it, then you need to constantly be on guard for signs. I don't discourage people from pits, I don't encourage them either. Pits should be owned by a certain type of person, and one with experience. They are adorable pets, with that big smile they have. They are good with people. In all my years of rescue, I trusted stray pits above all other breeds.
Lynn, it is not unusual to have sick cats at a no kill shelter or any other shelter. I'll use Rancho again as an example. When the County of San Bernardino was running the Rancho shelter (before Whine-ograd) they were ordered by the city council to stop euthanizing for 30 days. The staff documented the decline of the cat population's health from this. Although they were spending all their time medicating the cats, the cats were constantly re-infecting each other to the point that the medication could not work. The staff kept records and took pictures. Did no good. But in the end, many cats had to be euthanized, probably more than would have been without the 30 day stoppage.
And one only has to look to Lieds, NV to see that no kill has no eyes when it comes to suffering. Watch the numbers for "died in kennel" and it always goes way up in the "no kill" shelters. That's one way to stop euthanizing, just let them die of disease while confined. LA's has increased 125% and Rancho increased 600% after chosing no kill. It's all in public records.
It is hard to stay upbeat and yet Oreo does not want the blog to turn bitter. Thank God for her determination! Checking the petharbor it is 185 for dogs at 10:30 p.m. and a whopping 485 for the kitties. Please tell us how anybody can treat these animals. humanely. We are running tired here, but the thought is 185 dogs@ 15 minutes per dog = about 46 man hours per day. Not happening my friend, not even happening with that staff and volunteer level, Lets multiply that by 4 for the kitties....
Happy Camper, it is difficult at best, to not become bitter at the thought of these poor animals at NHS. Although NHS boasts of 1700 volunteers, it would be interesting to see just how many actually show up. Then the social dog having to endure only a few minutes of attention a day is enough to turn anyone bitter.
But we must not lose focus and keep our emotions under control. We're the only hope those poor animals have.
The comment that it began as a marketing term explains a lot. I don't go into my experiences with NHS because it serves no purpose to bash a shelter. Obviously we went out and purchased two mastiffs, so it didn't sour us on animals in general. But it is sad that a nice dog missed a good home because of their misguided attemts at control. The East bay SPCA sounds so grounded, you just feel like their animals stand a chance. When we went out to see the shepherd we were interested in she was matted, but she had a great personality and we could see the potential for a beautiful dog. She didn't get along with other dogs, but we didn't have other dogs. We spoke with the adoption person on the phone and went home to put up extra interior fencing, when we went to get the dog she was gone. They said they didn't do holds, well when you tell the person you have to double fence to accomodate the dog; over the week end is reasonable. We were heartsick, but the dog was returned three more times and they never called us. We had purchased the mastiffs but they didn't know that, so poor office skills for call back. I hope she didn't end up getting killed because or returns. I know they start to become una doptable.
That shelter looks like it would be a dream to work at. Mostly for the psych benefits. Yes you would lose dog and cats to euthansia but they would have decent lives and be adoptable until that time and I believe it would actually increase live release over time. We are getting comments up here about our conditions, and I don't know what to say, I am not going to tell a client snot nose is normal.
Volunteer, I have a link posted on my blog www.workingtohelpanimalstodaytomorrow.blogspot.com regarding higher live release rates that might interest you.
Huzzah for this organization's honest and clear words. I have gotten a lot of flack from folks in the area that work for/volunteer in limited admission shelters who keep publicity referring to the open-admission shelters as kill-shelters. Some of these folks insist there is no way to explain the limited/open admission policies to John Q. Public, and so they cling to the no-kill/kill division.
Thank you for posting this article. I will most certainly be passing it along!
-DogLogic, who seems to have forgotten her password again...
Post a Comment